|
Katrina
Hurricane damages exceed costliest storm to date
With life
getting back to normal in the Gulf region following on the disastrous 29
August Katrina Hurricane and the more moderate 24 September Hurricane
Rita, a clearer image of the economic impact of the disasters is
emerging. According to historical evidence from similar disasters in the
past, the impact of storms of this magnitude is typically only of a
temporary nature as reconstruction efforts compensate for output loss in
the wake of destruction. However, the damage caused by Katrina even
exceeded the costliest storm to date, Hurricane Andrew in 1992. According
to estimates from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) from 6 October,
damage to homes, government buildings, oil refineries and businesses will
total between US$ 70 billion and US$ 130 billion, which is considerably
lower than original guesstimates provided in the immediate aftermath of
the disaster. Of the total, at least US$ 40 billion in damages are
covered by private insurance. However, current government figures do not
include the immediate relief and rescue efforts, which have been paid for
by the US$ 62 billion Congress has already approved. But even including
the relief and rescue efforts, the total burden on the budget will fall
short of US$ 200 billion, according to the CBO, which sees the total
damages in the vicinity of US$ 150 billion. However, even if closer to
the maximum estimate, the total loss is sure to be insignificant when
compared to U.S. economic output – in 2004 gross domestic product (GDP)
amounted US$ 11.7 trillion. Even when considering output disruptions in
the three most affected states by Katrina - Louisiana, Mississippi and
Alabama – the direct impact on the national economy is limited since the
three states account for less that 3% of total U.S. output.
Damages to
oil sector send oil prices soaring to new highs
However,
the economic ramifications of the natural disasters are more far-reaching
than the direct property damages and the concomitant output losses. The
region hit by the storms is an important centre of the U.S. energy
sector. Not only did Katrina batter oil and gas production platforms in
the Gulf of Mexico but the hurricane also forced several Louisiana and
Mississippi refineries to close and the loss of electric power in the
region affected several major pipelines that deliver oil to other parts in
the country. Furthermore, while Katrina affected mainly oil production
platforms, Rita affected predominantly exploratory rig activity. Thus,
Hurricane Rita damage is forcing companies to delay exploration
activities. As a result of the damages, gasoline inventory levels that
were already at a low prior to the storms have dropped further. Markets
reacted promptly. In the aftermath of Katrina, the price for West Texas
Intermediate (WTI) briefly pierced the US$ 70 per barrel threshold, as
concerns about oil supply shortages rattled the markets. However, initial
concerns faded quickly as the International Energy Agency (IEA) announced
on 2 September that its 26 industrialized member countries would release 2
million barrels per day (bpd) of oil for 30 days to compensate for the
loss of U.S. crude and refining output. As a result, the WTI oil price
dropped back down to US$ 63.00 a barrel by mid-month only to rise again to
US$ 66.1 by 30 September amid renewed concerns about protracted oil supply
shortages in the wake of Rita. However, more important for consumer
confidence and thus the development of the entire economy is the level of
gasoline prices, which in turn depend largely on refining capacity.
Refinery
outages prompt concerns about gasoline supply
On 28
September, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) stated that
refinery outages resulting from the hurricanes amounted to lost production
of about 1.3 million barrels per day (bpd) for gasoline, over 700,000 bpd
for distillate fuel and nearly 400,000 bpd for jet fuel, amounting to a
total of over 3.5 million bpd that is currently offline or as much as 15%
of U.S. oil refining capacity. Therefore, with refineries not yet back to
full capacity, gasoline price are likely to remain high. According to EIA
information, the average U.S. retail gasoline price in the week up to 3
October reached US$ 2.93 per gallon, up 99 cents from a year ago. The
high gasoline price puts another drain on the already-stretched budgets of
increasingly indebted households, which are a key determining factor for
the overall health of the U.S. economy. The CBO claimed that evidence to
date suggests that overall economic effects will be “significant but not
overwhelming”. On 6 October, the CBO reiterated its initial estimate that
the devastation in the Gulf Coast region could cost as many as 400,000
jobs but reduced its cost estimate in terms of economic growth from up to
a full percentage point in the second half of the year to half a
percentage point..
U.S.
economy continued to grow at robust pace prior to Katrina Hurricane
The
economy was relatively robust prior to the storms. According to final
estimates released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis from 29 September,
the economy expanded by 3.3% in the second quarter, which was unchanged
from the preliminary estimates and only down one tenth of a percentage
point from the advance estimates released earlier. Therefore, second
quarter growth was considerably slower than the 3.8% pace registered in
the first quarter. However, the slowdown mostly reflected companies
drawing down inventories at a greater scale, which sliced 2.14% from the
second quarter expansion. Without the negative impact of the inventories,
gross domestic product (GDP) would have grown by 5.4% and if higher
gasoline prices do not eat too much into private consumption, inventories
will have to be replenished eventually, suggesting stronger growth for the
remainder of the year.
Storms
cause dent in economic activity towards the end of this year but
reconstruction to lift activity next year
Economists
are still gauging the impact of both storms on the U.S. economy. With
three quarters of the year over, the Consensus Forecast for the full year
2005 remained virtually unchanged over last month at 3.6%. However,
Consensus Forecast panellists have pared their outlook for the third
quarter by one tenth of a percentage point from 3.8% expected last month
to the current 3.7% and see the impact mostly concentrated in the final
quarter 2005, for which growth forecasts dropped from a 3.6% expansion
projected last month to 3.2% growth. Next year, however, reconstruction
efforts will kick in and should lift economic activity beyond the pace
previously anticipated. Consensus Forecast panellists maintained the
growth forecast for the first quarter at 3.4% but lifted their projections
for the second quarter from 3.4% to 3.5%, for the third quarter from 3.1%
to 3.2% and for the fourth quarter 2006 from 3.1% to 3.3%. Further
downward revisions to the growth outlook are possible if the effect of
disruptions in the oil industry and the impact of higher gasoline prices
on consumption become more noticeable than anticipated.
Overwhelming majority provides Koizumi with strong mandate to continue
economic reforms
On 11
September, Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi won a landslide victory with
296 seats of the 480-member lower house of parliament. Following the
rejection of the postal privatisation bill in the upper house on 8 August,
Koizumi had called for new elections for the lower house two years ahead
of schedule. The upper house rejected Koizumi's proposal to privatise the
postal system after rebellious members of the prime minister’s own ruling
Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) joined the opposition to vote against the
reform bill in a 125 to 108 vote against the government. Ever since
assuming power in 2001, President Koizumi had always declared the reform
of Japan Post (JP) a centrepiece of his political agenda. The postal
entityis not only the nation's largest employer but also as a financial
institution is the world’s largest savings bank. However, opponents
within the LDP claimed that the reform of the postal system would result
in job losses. Therefore, the defeat of the JP bill by dissidents within
the LDP did not come as a surprise and Koizumi had threatened to call for
early elections if the bill was defeated prior to the vote. Since Koizumi
had expelled most of the LDP dissenters who opposed post office reform,
the 296 seats grants him a sound majority in the lower house to push
through his reform plans. Moreover, LDP’s coalition partner, the New
Komeito party, garnered 31 seats, giving the ruling coalition more than
320 seats or a two-thirds majority. By securing two-thirds of the lower
chamber, the coalition can now pass bills through parliament even when
facing opposition in the upper house, where the coalition has only a slim
majority. Faced with negligible opposition, Koizumi is likely not only to
push through the postal reform bill but also may embark on more
far-reaching economic reform projects before handing over power to his
successor in September 2006.
Consensus
more optimistic as Japanese economy continues recovery but deflation
lingers
The
renewed momentum for economic reforms comes at a time when the economy is
already showing clear signs of gaining momentum. In the second quarter,
GDP grew at a 3.3%. While the figure represents a slowdown compared with
the 5.8% expansion registered in the first quarter, the first quarter
number was inflated by a bounce-back of consumption that previously been
held back by adverse weather conditions. Moreover, the second quarter
growth figure from 12 September was triple the initial August estimate.
Private consumption, which had dragged on the Japanese economy in the
past cycle, is recovering, assisted by investment, which grew at a robust
pace for the second consecutive quarter. Moreover, initial data suggest
that the economy continued to develop along a healthy trajectory
throughout the third quarter. In August, industrial production rebounded
1.2% in seasonally adjusted after dropping 1.2% in July and spending by
households headed by a salaried worker rose a seasonally adjusted 3.2%
percent from July. On the downside, consumer prices remain firmly
entrenched in deflationary territory. In August, core consumer prices,
which exclude fresh food, fell 0.1% from a year earlier and Consensus
Forecast panellists expect deflation to persist through the end of the
year with an annual price drop of 0.13% this year. However, the economy
will recover in spite of the negative repercussions of deflation.
Consensus Forecast panellists have lifted their projections for economic
growth this year from 1.9% expected last month to the current 2.0%. For
2006, the Consensus Forecast is also more upbeat, anticipating GDP to grow
at the same 2.0% pace, which is up one tenth of a percentage point over
last month’s projection. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has also
beefed up the 0.8% growth forecast from April this year. In the IMF’s
World Economic Outlook from September, officials project the Japanese
economy to expand 2.0% this and next year, which is bang in line with the
current Consensus Forecast figures.
Elections
in Germany result in stalemate between two leading parties
On 18
September, not even a week after Koizumi won in Japan, elections were held
one year ahead of schedule in Germany, the world’s third largest economy.
The election resulted in a stalemate between the two leading contenders
incumbent chancellor Gerhard Schröder from the
social
democratic party (SPD, Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands) and
the candidate of the conservatives Angela Merkel from Christian Democratic
Union (CDU, Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands).
As in Japan, a stalemate on reform prompted the call for early elections.
However, unlike in Japan, the electorate refused to endorse a
reform-friendly coalition favoured by the polls ahead of the elections
between
conservative and liberal elements (FDP, Freie Demokratische Partei).
Instead, voters lifted five parties beyond the 5% threshold necessary to
have parliamentary representation and weakened the two leading parties,
CDU and SPD. Preliminary attempts to form a coalition with the smaller
political parties failed amid strongly differing positions regarding key
policy issues. Therefore, the only feasible solution at the time being is
for a grand coalition of CDU and SPD. So far, however,
both
leading parties claim the top job for themselves, which is protracting
policy negotiations. As a result, even two weeks after the elections no
clear signs point towards who will be the next occupant of the
chancellery. Moreover, if a grand coalition between the two leading
parties is formed, legislative initiatives are likely to reflect the
lowest common denominator instead of the more far-reaching reform
necessary to revive the ailing economy.
Outlook
for Asia improves but IMF sees risk that higher oil prices could derail
global economic growth
Growth
prospects for Asia continue to improve. Following on last month’s 0.1
percentage point upgrade to this year’s economic growth forecast for the
entire Asian region including Japan, Consensus Forecast panellists beefed
up the outlook another tenth of a percentage point this month to 4.2%.
Increasing optimism about economic recovery in Japan accounted for the
lion share of this month’s upgrade. However, the forecast for output
growth in non-Japan Asia also inched upwards by one tenth of a percentage
point from 6.5% expected last month to the current 6.6%. The regional
average growth forecast for 2005 increased even though oil prices continue
to rise to new highs. In fact, in the IMF’s September World Economic
Outlook, officials identify high and volatile oil prices as the key risk
to global growth. Since the end of last year, the oil price has risen by
over US$ 20 per barrel and with the market very tight, the IMF does not
rule out a further substantial jump in oil prices. According to the IMF,
options markets suggest a 15% chance that the WTI price could rise above
the US$ 80 per barrel threshold. So far, higher oil prices have had a
surprisingly moderate impact on global growth, in part because higher oil
prices had reflected strong global demand. However, more recent oil price
spikes owe less to demand pressures than to concerns about supply. The
Fund claims that further price increases could have a less benign impact
on economic growth, especially if the oil price increases have a
significant effect on consumer confidence and therefore consumer
spending. In addition, higher oil prices could also feed through to
higher inflationary expectations which could trigger a sharp rise in
interest rates with deleterious effects on economic growth.
Growth
outlook for Latin America remains unchanged as weaker Mexico offsets
improved outlook of other regional economies
The
outlook for Latin American output growth this year remained unchanged over
the past month, as a more pessimistic outlook in Mexico compensated for
improved prospects in most other economies. As a result, the Consensus
Forecast for GDP growth in 2005 for Latin America stayed at 4.0%,
following on last year’s stellar 5.9% expansion. However, prospects for
next year improved a notch from 3.7% growth expected last month to the
current 3.8% projection. This month, an improved growth forecast for six
of the seven major economies was insufficient to lift the regional
outlook, as Mexico was revised downward 0.2 percentage points over last
month. Since Mexico is the region’s largest economy, accounting for 34.6%
of total output, a downward revision to the regional behemoth is difficult
to offset. The downward revision in Mexico was mainly motivated by worse
than expected developments in the second quarter, exacerbated by continued
weak showings in the country’s all-important manufacturing sector. In
addition, with almost 90% of all exports directed to the United States,
Mexico is the most likely Latin American economy to suffer from
potentially slower growth in the United States towards the end of the year
in the wake of the Katrina and Rita Hurricanes.
Venezuela
profits from strong oil prices while cyclical rebound persists in
Argentina
Venezuela
experienced the strongest upward revision to the 2005 GDP forecast, which
improved from 6.3% expected last month to 7.4% this month, as the country
is benefiting from high oil prices. While the Venezuela oil price has
receded from the US$ 58 per barrel threshold it reached at the beginning
of September amid supply concerns in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, most
observers expect the oil price to remain high amid continued strong demand
combined with a constrained supply situation. The resulting boost to
government income from rising oil prices is helping government spending, a
key driver behind the current strength in the economy. However, given
the importance of oil in the economy, the pace of expansion is rather a
surprise to the downside. Argentina experienced the second-strongest
upward revision to the 2005 GDP forecast, which was raised from 6.8%
expected last month to the current 7.3%. Following on two years of strong
growth, most economists had expected the growth pace to moderate, as the
cyclical rebound from the preceding recession is drawing to an end.
However, even though economic activity added 8.8% in 2003 and 9.0% in
2004, the devastating recession that held its grip over the economy for
full four years has provided for more cyclical recovery potential than
anticipated.
Brazil
outlook boosted as Central Bank eases policy
Consensus
Forecast panellists again lifted the growth forecast for Brazil by 0.1
percentage points over last month to 3.3%. This month represented the
second consecutive upward revision, and is primarily motivated by the
easing of monetary policy but also a persistence of healthy domestic
demand. Brazil’s Central Bank had kept policy extremely tight for more
than a year, resulting in one of the highest real interest rates
worldwide, which threatened to suffocate the economy. However,
inflationary pressures have been receding, which has allowed monetary
authorities to cut interest rates again. Finally, growth prospects for
Chile, Colombia and Peru also improved over last month. All three
countries benefit from a less pronounced slowdown of the external sector
and continued strong commodity prices.
|